Speed with Soul

What a San Diego court case reveals about AI, judgment, and why speed alone isn’t enough

The Ghost in the Courtroom

A custody dispute over a dog in San Diego turned into something much bigger. Not because of the outcome, but because of how it broke.

During the proceedings, both sides cited legal precedents to support their arguments. That’s standard. What wasn’t standard is that several of those cases didn’t exist. They weren’t obscure or misinterpreted. They were fabricated.

Those citations made it into legal filings, then into a proposed ruling, and eventually into a signed court order. No one caught it. Not the attorneys, not opposing counsel, and not the judge.

When the issue surfaced, the appellate court stepped in with sanctions and a straightforward warning: the use of AI doesn’t change the responsibility to verify what you’re putting forward. If anything, it raises the bar.

When Friction Disappears

This is where the story shifts from a legal error to a broader warning.

AI didn’t just make it easier to produce work. It removed the friction that used to force people to think.

There was a time when verifying sources was simply part of the process because it had to be. It took effort, and that effort acted as a natural filter.

Now, the dynamic has flipped. You can generate something that looks polished and credible in seconds. The work feels finished long before it has actually been validated.

The problem isn’t that AI makes mistakes. It’s that it makes it easier for people to move forward without fully understanding what they’re relying on.

The New Constraint

Execution used to be the hard part. Getting something built, validated, and shipped took time, and that time naturally slowed decisions down.

That constraint is mostly gone. You can now explore directions and generate outputs faster than most teams can process them.

What hasn’t changed is the need to decide what actually matters.

If anything, that responsibility has become heavier. There are more inputs, more options, and more noise. When you apply faster tools to the same decision models, you don’t get leverage. You just get more activity.

Speed with Soul

“Speed with Soul” isn’t about slowing down or resisting technology. It’s about maintaining judgment in an environment where speed is no longer a constraint.

It means being deliberate about what gets built, not just how quickly something can be pushed through.

It means knowing what to ignore, even when everything looks viable.

And it means taking responsibility for the decision, instead of hiding behind what the system produced.

Because the real risk isn’t that AI will replace decision-making. It’s that people will gradually give it up.

The Guardrail Is You

The San Diego case is a preview of what that looks like in practice. The issue wasn’t just that the citations were wrong. It’s that multiple layers of human review failed to catch them, even as the output moved forward with increasing confidence.

Speed didn’t create that problem. It exposed it.

AI didn’t raise the ceiling. It removed the guardrails.

Speed is easy now.

Judgment is the advantage.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jason M. Riggs is an AI product executive and the author of The MACH-10 PM, a system for high-velocity product leadership built around decision velocity, execution clarity, and AI-native operating models.

His work focuses on how teams operate when speed is no longer the constraint — and why judgment becomes the new bottleneck.

Learn more →

Scroll to Top